How Bitcoin Disrupts the Finance Industry

How Bitcoin Disrupts the Finance Industry .

Cryptocurrencies and their underlying blockchain technology are being touted as the next-big-thing after the creation of the internet. One area where these technologies are likely to have a major impact is the financial sector. The blockchain, as a form of distributed ledger technology (DLT), has the potential to transform well-established financial institutions and bring lower costs, faster execution of transactions, improved transparency, auditability of operations, and other benefits. Cryptocurrencies hold the promise of a new native digital asset class without a central authority.

So what do these technological developments mean for the various players in the sector and end users? “Blockchains have the potential to displace any business activity built on transactions occurring on traditional corporate databases, which is what underlies nearly every financial service function. Any financial operation that has low transparency and limited traceability is vulnerable to disruption by blockchain applications. DLT is therefore both a great opportunity and also a disruptive threat,” according to Bruce Weber, dean of Lerner College and business administration professor, and Andrew Novocin, professor of electrical and computer engineering, both at the University of Delaware.

Earlier this year, Weber, Novocin, and graduate student Jonathan Wood conducted a literature review on cryptocurrencies and DLT for the SWIFT Institute. Based on this review, the SWIFT institute recently issued a grant to conduct new research on DLT and cryptocurrencies in the financial sector. Weber and Novocin noted that just as disruptors like Amazon, Google, Facebook and Uber built software platforms and thriving businesses thanks to the connectivity provided by internet standards, next-generation startups will build new services and businesses with blockchains. “Many pundits expect blockchain, as a distributed technology, to become the foundation for new services and applications that have completely different rules from those running on hierarchical and controlled databases. Cryptocurrencies are an early example but many others will follow,” they added.

Kartik Hosanagar, a Wharton professor of marketing and operations, information and decisions, pointed out that the financial services sector is full of intermediaries such as banks that help create trust among transacting parties like lenders and borrowers. Blockchain, he said, is a mechanism to create trust without centralized control. “The power of eliminating intermediaries is the ability to lower transaction costs and take back control from powerful financial intermediaries.”

Regarding cryptocurrencies, Hosanagar pointed out that most of the value today is tied to speculative buying rather than actual use cases. But having a currency without a central authority offers “certain unique kinds of protections especially in countries with troubled central banks.” For example, Venezuela’s currency is rapidly losing value. For people who stored their savings in crypto, there was greater protection against such rapid currency devaluations. “Of course, cryptocurrencies have their own instabilities, but they aren’t tied to actions by central banks and that’s particularly relevant in countries and economies where citizens don’t trust their governments and central banks,” he said.

“Any financial operation that has low transparency and limited traceability is vulnerable to disruption by blockchain applications.”–Bruce Weber and Andrew Novocin

Hosanagar expects the first wave of applications to be rolled out in “private” blockchains where a central authority such as a financial institution and its partners are the only ones with the permission to participate (as opposed to public, permissionless blockchains where participants are anonymous and there is no central authority). Applications in the private blockchains, he said, will be more secure and will offer some of the benefits of decentralized ledgers but will not be radically different from the way things work at present. However, over time, he expects smart contracts (self-executing contracts when requirements are met) to be offered on public blockchain networks like Ethereum. “When securities are traded, intermediaries provide trust, and they charge commissions. Blockchains can help provide such trust in a low-cost manner. But trade of securities is governed by securities laws. Smart contracts offer a way to ensure compliance with the laws. They have great potential because of their ability to reduce costs while being compliant,” says Hosanagar.

According to Weber and Novocin, one area ripe for transformation is reaching consensus on important benchmark rates and prices. At present, they point out, different proprietary indexes are used to determine interest rates and the price of many mainstream assets. Blockchain can transform this. “Think of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and the recent scandals involving manipulation of benchmark values when they are controlled by a single entity that may not be capable of detecting false or fraudulent data. Blockchain could provide greater transparency around the process of creating agreed upon reference prices, and allow more people to participate in the consensus process.”

Weber and Novocin expect that in some areas intermediaries will find their roles reduced as blockchain allows for automation through greater transparency and traceability. In other areas, intermediaries will find themselves well-placed to take advantage of changing needs of their clients, as firms will need help to manage the shift to new standards as well as the greater complexity of open and traceable blockchain infrastructure. Intermediaries in areas that could potentially be disrupted, they said, “should get involved with projects seeking to set the standards, so that they can stay informed and position themselves to profit from becoming the leaders in the operations of the new markets that will emerge.”

Kevin Werbach, Wharton professor of legal studies and business ethics, and author of a forthcoming book The Blockchain and the New Architecture of Trust,  said that it’s usually not helpful to focus on what aspects of a major existing market will be “transformed” or “disrupted” by new technologies. Important technologies, he said, are far more likely to be integrated into the system than replace it. According to Werbach, while some firms will fail to make the transition and some new ones will take hold, “over the long-run, virtually every historic innovation that eliminated some forms of intermediation also created new forms.”

Blockchain will reduce the massive duplication of information that creates delays, conflicts and confusion in many aspects of financial services, Werbach added. For example, when a syndicate of lenders participates in a loan, having one shared ledger means they don’t all need to keep track of it independently. International payments and corporate stock records are other examples where there are huge inefficiencies due to duplicate record-keeping and intermediaries. “End users won’t see the changes in the deep plumbing of financial services, but it will allow new service providers to emerge and new products to be offered,” said Werbach.

Bumps Along the Way

Angela Walch, professor of law at St. Mary’s University School of Law and a research fellow at the Centre for Blockchain Technologies at University College London, offered another perspective. She said there is a lot of excitement about blockchain as a distributed ledger technology for the financial sector because many believe that it offers a better, more efficient and more resilient form of recordkeeping. However, making use of the blockchain is not as simple as just buying new software and running it. “Blockchain technology is, at core, group recordkeeping. To reap its full benefits, one needs all the relevant members of the group to join the system. This requires collaboration with and across businesses, which is a potentially big hurdle, and may be the hurdle that most limits adoption.”

Governance is the biggest challenge in decentralized organizations, said Weber and Novocin. Members participating in a blockchain-supported financial function may have misaligned incentives, and can end up in gridlock, or with a chaotic outcome. They cite the example of the ‘DAO Hack,’ which was the first prominent smart contract project on the Ethereum network to suffer a large loss of funds. The Ethereum community voted to conduct a hard fork (a radical change to the protocol that makes previously invalid blocks/transactions valid or vice-versa) — reversing the transactions after the hack and essentially refunding the DAO investors. This was in effect a breach of Ethereum’s immutability and it left a sizeable minority of the community bitterly dissatisfied. This group viewed the Ethereum community as forsaking its commitment to immutable, permanent records. They refused to acknowledge the hard fork, and maintained the original Ethereum blockchain, now known as Ethereum Classic (whereas the forked version supported by the Ethereum Foundation is simply Ethereum).

“The power of eliminating intermediaries is the ability to lower transaction costs and take back control from powerful financial intermediaries.”–Kartik Hosanagar

“Distributed organizations serving an open community need to take care to design their governance systems, incentive structures and decision-making processes to create consensus without unduly slowing down the decision-making,” said Weber and Novocin. “Scenario planning or war gaming are worth exploring at the beginning of blockchain projects. Forward planning enables organizations to swiftly respond in a predictable way that is supportive of stakeholders. Publicizing these plans in advance can also build trust and user confidence.”

Cryptocurrency Risks.

Werbach listed a variety of risks and vulnerabilities related to cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin has shown that the fundamental security of its proof-of-work system is sound, but it has major limitations such as limited scalability, massive energy usage and concentration of mining pools. There has been massive theft of cryptocurrencies from the centralized intermediaries that most people use to hold it, and massive fraud by promoters of initial coin offerings and other schemes. Manipulation is widespread on lightly-regulated cryptocurrency exchanges.

For example, roughly half of Bitcoin transactions are with Tether, a “stablecoin” that claims to be backed by U.S. dollars but has never been audited and is involved in highly suspicious behavior. Money laundering and other criminal activity is a serious problem if transactions do not require some check of real-world identities. “There are major efforts to address all of these risks and vulnerabilities. Some are technical, some are business opportunities, and some are regulatory questions. There must be recognition among cryptocurrency proponents that maturation of the industry will require cooperation in many cases with incumbents and regulators,” added Werbach.

Hosanagar cautions that while decentralization offers significant value — and a significant number of miners/validators must verify the transaction for it to be validated — it is still susceptible to collusion. If one or a few companies running lots of miners/validators in a small network collude, they can affect the sanctity of the network. The big risk with cryptocurrencies, he added, is that most activity as of today is ultimately tied to speculation. It’s important for cryptocurrencies to discover a “killer app soon so there is some underlying value created beyond speculation of its future value,” Hosanagar concludes.

The Way Ahead?

Given all these challenges, what is the current mindset in the financial sector towards adopting these new technologies? And, importantly, should one push for wide acceptance and deployment, or is there need for them to stabilize first?

According to Werbach, “It’s not an either-or” choice. Cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology in general, he noted, are immature currently. However, there are some areas where they are already able to be deployed effectively. The best way to work through today’s problems, is “to build working systems and see where difficulties arise,” Werbach said. Looking ahead, integration with law, regulation and governance will be critical. Blockchain and cryptocurrencies represent a new form of trust, he added. They will only succeed if they become sufficiently trustworthy, beyond the basic security of the distributed ledgers. “Law, regulation and governance are three major mechanisms to produce trustworthy systems that scale up to society-wide adoption. We need to find ways to address the legitimate concerns of governments without overly restricting the innovations that blockchain technology enables. I’m optimistic about that process over time.”

“We need to find ways to address the legitimate concerns of governments without overly restricting the innovations that blockchain technology enables.”–Kevin Werbach

Walch noted that while there are claims that some consortia are putting ‘blockchain’ systems into production, in many cases it appears that what they are calling a blockchain bears little to no resemblance to the original blockchain technology behind Bitcoin. In many instances, she said, existing shared databases are being called ‘blockchain’ for marketing purposes. “If people do use something they call DLT or blockchain technology in important financial systems, my hope is that they make the decision based on actual capabilities of the tech rather than its widely hyped and generally overstated capabilities,” Walch said. “Permissioned blockchains, which are the variation most likely to be used for financial systems recordkeeping, are very different from public blockchains like Bitcoin or Ethereum. I hope that a more modest and accurate understanding of the actual characteristics of permissioned blockchains sinks in before they are widely adopted.”

Regarding cryptocurrencies or cryptoassets, Walch said that the financial sector’s interest is “less about recordkeeping and more about a new financial asset that it can make money off of.” She pointed out that at present there is no clarity on how power and accountability work in these systems. The ongoing operation of crypto systems and the value they embed and support is reliant on the competence of, and ethical behavior by, unaccountable software developers and validators. “The financial sector believes it understands and can manage the risks of cryptoassets, but I am less certain and worry that hubris and greed are driving the push to create cryptoassets as a real asset class. This has been a bad mixture in the past,” says Walch. “I think it would be more responsible to let cryptosystems exist on their own for a while longer to let more of the kinks get worked out — if they can be; I’m not sure the governance ones can — rather than to rapidly integrate them into the financial system as we seem to be doing.”

“I … worry that hubris and greed are driving the push to create cryptoassets as a real asset class.”–Angela Walch

Conversely, Weber and Novocin feel that the financial industry is cautious about the new DLT technology. According to them, to build confidence in new blockchain systems there needs to be transparency around how the processes work and what the benefits are, and in order to secure adoption, they need to be straightforward to use. “Pundits have drawn parallels to the open source Linux operating system. Although only a few individuals use Linux directly, it quietly runs the vast majority of servers and cloud processors across the world. Similarly, early adoption of blockchain will likely happen in the background of business processes. Companies should get involved now, even if it is just to experiment with the concepts. By gaining familiarity with these new tools, they will be ready as the space continues to develop.”

Weber and Novocin expect that in the next few years, many more businesses will implement private blockchains to improve the transparency and traceability of their financial operations, supply chains, inventory management systems and other internal business systems. Clearer standards will be adopted and a few high-profile projects will emerge. Meanwhile, they said, R&D will continue among the many decentralized blockchain projects to invent more scalable public ledgers whether it be blockchain, Tangle, Hashgraph or something new. “Work is needed on better and more efficient consensus models, whether it be a new form of proof-of-stake or proof-of-work, or something else. There are many established groups, startups, companies and research teams that organizations can join, partner with, or support in order to contribute to research and expand their capabilities.”




Bitcoin (Currency),Bitcoin,Finance (Industry),Industry (Organization Sector),Brad Templeton,Singularity University,Innovation,Internet,Web,Website,Google,Disruption,Technology,Technological,Money,Currency,Gold,Big Think,BigThink,BigThink.com,Education,Educational,Lifelong Learning,EDU

July 16, 2020

How the Blockchain Will Impact the Financial Sector

How the Blockchain Will Impact the Financial Sector.

Cryptocurrencies and their underlying blockchain technology are being touted as the next-big-thing after the creation of the internet. One area where these technologies are likely to have a major impact is the financial sector. The blockchain, as a form of distributed ledger technology (DLT), has the potential to transform well-established financial institutions and bring lower costs, faster execution of transactions, improved transparency, auditability of operations, and other benefits. Cryptocurrencies hold the promise of a new native digital asset class without a central authority.

So what do these technological developments mean for the various players in the sector and end users? “Blockchains have the potential to displace any business activity built on transactions occurring on traditional corporate databases, which is what underlies nearly every financial service function. Any financial operation that has low transparency and limited traceability is vulnerable to disruption by blockchain applications. DLT is therefore both a great opportunity and also a disruptive threat,” according to Bruce Weber, dean of Lerner College and business administration professor, and Andrew Novocin, professor of electrical and computer engineering, both at the University of Delaware.

Earlier this year, Weber, Novocin, and graduate student Jonathan Wood conducted a literature review on cryptocurrencies and DLT for the SWIFT Institute. Based on this review, the SWIFT institute recently issued a grant to conduct new research on DLT and cryptocurrencies in the financial sector. Weber and Novocin noted that just as disruptors like Amazon, Google, Facebook and Uber built software platforms and thriving businesses thanks to the connectivity provided by internet standards, next-generation startups will build new services and businesses with blockchains. “Many pundits expect blockchain, as a distributed technology, to become the foundation for new services and applications that have completely different rules from those running on hierarchical and controlled databases. Cryptocurrencies are an early example but many others will follow,” they added.

Kartik Hosanagar, a Wharton professor of marketing and operations, information and decisions, pointed out that the financial services sector is full of intermediaries such as banks that help create trust among transacting parties like lenders and borrowers. Blockchain, he said, is a mechanism to create trust without centralized control. “The power of eliminating intermediaries is the ability to lower transaction costs and take back control from powerful financial intermediaries.”

Regarding cryptocurrencies, Hosanagar pointed out that most of the value today is tied to speculative buying rather than actual use cases. But having a currency without a central authority offers “certain unique kinds of protections especially in countries with troubled central banks.” For example, Venezuela’s currency is rapidly losing value. For people who stored their savings in crypto, there was greater protection against such rapid currency devaluations. “Of course, cryptocurrencies have their own instabilities, but they aren’t tied to actions by central banks and that’s particularly relevant in countries and economies where citizens don’t trust their governments and central banks,” he said.

“Any financial operation that has low transparency and limited traceability is vulnerable to disruption by blockchain applications.”–Bruce Weber and Andrew Novocin

Hosanagar expects the first wave of applications to be rolled out in “private” blockchains where a central authority such as a financial institution and its partners are the only ones with the permission to participate (as opposed to public, permissionless blockchains where participants are anonymous and there is no central authority). Applications in the private blockchains, he said, will be more secure and will offer some of the benefits of decentralized ledgers but will not be radically different from the way things work at present. However, over time, he expects smart contracts (self-executing contracts when requirements are met) to be offered on public blockchain networks like Ethereum. “When securities are traded, intermediaries provide trust, and they charge commissions. Blockchains can help provide such trust in a low-cost manner. But trade of securities is governed by securities laws. Smart contracts offer a way to ensure compliance with the laws. They have great potential because of their ability to reduce costs while being compliant,” says Hosanagar.

According to Weber and Novocin, one area ripe for transformation is reaching consensus on important benchmark rates and prices. At present, they point out, different proprietary indexes are used to determine interest rates and the price of many mainstream assets. Blockchain can transform this. “Think of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and the recent scandals involving manipulation of benchmark values when they are controlled by a single entity that may not be capable of detecting false or fraudulent data. Blockchain could provide greater transparency around the process of creating agreed upon reference prices, and allow more people to participate in the consensus process.”

Weber and Novocin expect that in some areas intermediaries will find their roles reduced as blockchain allows for automation through greater transparency and traceability. In other areas, intermediaries will find themselves well-placed to take advantage of changing needs of their clients, as firms will need help to manage the shift to new standards as well as the greater complexity of open and traceable blockchain infrastructure. Intermediaries in areas that could potentially be disrupted, they said, “should get involved with projects seeking to set the standards, so that they can stay informed and position themselves to profit from becoming the leaders in the operations of the new markets that will emerge.”

Kevin Werbach, Wharton professor of legal studies and business ethics, and author of a forthcoming book The Blockchain and the New Architecture of Trust,  said that it’s usually not helpful to focus on what aspects of a major existing market will be “transformed” or “disrupted” by new technologies. Important technologies, he said, are far more likely to be integrated into the system than replace it. According to Werbach, while some firms will fail to make the transition and some new ones will take hold, “over the long-run, virtually every historic innovation that eliminated some forms of intermediation also created new forms.”


Blockchain will reduce the massive duplication of information that creates delays, conflicts and confusion in many aspects of financial services, Werbach added. For example, when a syndicate of lenders participates in a loan, having one shared ledger means they don’t all need to keep track of it independently. International payments and corporate stock records are other examples where there are huge inefficiencies due to duplicate record-keeping and intermediaries. “End users won’t see the changes in the deep plumbing of financial services, but it will allow new service providers to emerge and new products to be offered,” said Werbach.

Bumps Along the Way

Angela Walch, professor of law at St. Mary’s University School of Law and a research fellow at the Centre for Blockchain Technologies at University College London, offered another perspective. She said there is a lot of excitement about blockchain as a distributed ledger technology for the financial sector because many believe that it offers a better, more efficient and more resilient form of recordkeeping. However, making use of the blockchain is not as simple as just buying new software and running it. “Blockchain technology is, at core, group recordkeeping. To reap its full benefits, one needs all the relevant members of the group to join the system. This requires collaboration with and across businesses, which is a potentially big hurdle, and may be the hurdle that most limits adoption.”

Governance is the biggest challenge in decentralized organizations, said Weber and Novocin. Members participating in a blockchain-supported financial function may have misaligned incentives, and can end up in gridlock, or with a chaotic outcome. They cite the example of the ‘DAO Hack,’ which was the first prominent smart contract project on the Ethereum network to suffer a large loss of funds. The Ethereum community voted to conduct a hard fork (a radical change to the protocol that makes previously invalid blocks/transactions valid or vice-versa) — reversing the transactions after the hack and essentially refunding the DAO investors. This was in effect a breach of Ethereum’s immutability and it left a sizeable minority of the community bitterly dissatisfied. This group viewed the Ethereum community as forsaking its commitment to immutable, permanent records. They refused to acknowledge the hard fork, and maintained the original Ethereum blockchain, now known as Ethereum Classic (whereas the forked version supported by the Ethereum Foundation is simply Ethereum).

“The power of eliminating intermediaries is the ability to lower transaction costs and take back control from powerful financial intermediaries.”–Kartik Hosanagar

“Distributed organizations serving an open community need to take care to design their governance systems, incentive structures and decision-making processes to create consensus without unduly slowing down the decision-making,” said Weber and Novocin. “Scenario planning or war gaming are worth exploring at the beginning of blockchain projects. Forward planning enables organizations to swiftly respond in a predictable way that is supportive of stakeholders. Publicizing these plans in advance can also build trust and user confidence.”

Cryptocurrency Risks.

Werbach listed a variety of risks and vulnerabilities related to cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin has shown that the fundamental security of its proof-of-work system is sound, but it has major limitations such as limited scalability, massive energy usage and concentration of mining pools. There has been massive theft of cryptocurrencies from the centralized intermediaries that most people use to hold it, and massive fraud by promoters of initial coin offerings and other schemes. Manipulation is widespread on lightly-regulated cryptocurrency exchanges.

For example, roughly half of Bitcoin transactions are with Tether, a “stablecoin” that claims to be backed by U.S. dollars but has never been audited and is involved in highly suspicious behavior. Money laundering and other criminal activity is a serious problem if transactions do not require some check of real-world identities. “There are major efforts to address all of these risks and vulnerabilities. Some are technical, some are business opportunities, and some are regulatory questions. There must be recognition among cryptocurrency proponents that maturation of the industry will require cooperation in many cases with incumbents and regulators,” added Werbach.

Hosanagar cautions that while decentralization offers significant value — and a significant number of miners/validators must verify the transaction for it to be validated — it is still susceptible to collusion. If one or a few companies running lots of miners/validators in a small network collude, they can affect the sanctity of the network. The big risk with cryptocurrencies, he added, is that most activity as of today is ultimately tied to speculation. It’s important for cryptocurrencies to discover a “killer app soon so there is some underlying value created beyond speculation of its future value,” Hosanagar concludes.

The Way Ahead?

Given all these challenges, what is the current mindset in the financial sector towards adopting these new technologies? And, importantly, should one push for wide acceptance and deployment, or is there need for them to stabilize first?

According to Werbach, “It’s not an either-or” choice. Cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology in general, he noted, are immature currently. However, there are some areas where they are already able to be deployed effectively. The best way to work through today’s problems, is “to build working systems and see where difficulties arise,” Werbach said. Looking ahead, integration with law, regulation and governance will be critical. Blockchain and cryptocurrencies represent a new form of trust, he added. They will only succeed if they become sufficiently trustworthy, beyond the basic security of the distributed ledgers. “Law, regulation and governance are three major mechanisms to produce trustworthy systems that scale up to society-wide adoption. We need to find ways to address the legitimate concerns of governments without overly restricting the innovations that blockchain technology enables. I’m optimistic about that process over time.”

“We need to find ways to address the legitimate concerns of governments without overly restricting the innovations that blockchain technology enables.”–Kevin Werbach

Walch noted that while there are claims that some consortia are putting ‘blockchain’ systems into production, in many cases it appears that what they are calling a blockchain bears little to no resemblance to the original blockchain technology behind Bitcoin. In many instances, she said, existing shared databases are being called ‘blockchain’ for marketing purposes. “If people do use something they call DLT or blockchain technology in important financial systems, my hope is that they make the decision based on actual capabilities of the tech rather than its widely hyped and generally overstated capabilities,” Walch said. “Permissioned blockchains, which are the variation most likely to be used for financial systems recordkeeping, are very different from public blockchains like Bitcoin or Ethereum. I hope that a more modest and accurate understanding of the actual characteristics of permissioned blockchains sinks in before they are widely adopted.”

Regarding cryptocurrencies or cryptoassets, Walch said that the financial sector’s interest is “less about recordkeeping and more about a new financial asset that it can make money off of.” She pointed out that at present there is no clarity on how power and accountability work in these systems. The ongoing operation of crypto systems and the value they embed and support is reliant on the competence of, and ethical behavior by, unaccountable software developers and validators. “The financial sector believes it understands and can manage the risks of cryptoassets, but I am less certain and worry that hubris and greed are driving the push to create cryptoassets as a real asset class. This has been a bad mixture in the past,” says Walch. “I think it would be more responsible to let cryptosystems exist on their own for a while longer to let more of the kinks get worked out — if they can be; I’m not sure the governance ones can — rather than to rapidly integrate them into the financial system as we seem to be doing.”

“I … worry that hubris and greed are driving the push to create cryptoassets as a real asset class.”–Angela Walch

Conversely, Weber and Novocin feel that the financial industry is cautious about the new DLT technology. According to them, to build confidence in new blockchain systems there needs to be transparency around how the processes work and what the benefits are, and in order to secure adoption, they need to be straightforward to use. “Pundits have drawn parallels to the open source Linux operating system. Although only a few individuals use Linux directly, it quietly runs the vast majority of servers and cloud processors across the world. Similarly, early adoption of blockchain will likely happen in the background of business processes. Companies should get involved now, even if it is just to experiment with the concepts. By gaining familiarity with these new tools, they will be ready as the space continues to develop.”

Weber and Novocin expect that in the next few years, many more businesses will implement private blockchains to improve the transparency and traceability of their financial operations, supply chains, inventory management systems and other internal business systems. Clearer standards will be adopted and a few high-profile projects will emerge. Meanwhile, they said, R&D will continue among the many decentralized blockchain projects to invent more scalable public ledgers whether it be blockchain, Tangle, Hashgraph or something new. “Work is needed on better and more efficient consensus models, whether it be a new form of proof-of-stake or proof-of-work, or something else. There are many established groups, startups, companies and research teams that organizations can join, partner with, or support in order to contribute to research and expand their capabilities.”




Bitcoin (Currency),Bitcoin,Finance (Industry),Industry (Organization Sector),Brad Templeton,Singularity University,Innovation,Internet,Web,Website,Google,Disruption,Technology,Technological,Money,Currency,Gold,Big Think,BigThink,BigThink.com,Education,Educational,Lifelong Learning,EDU

July 16, 2020

How to Write a Proposal Letter

How to Write a Proposal Letter.

A proposal letter is a professional letter that states, in an abbreviated form, why an organization, institution, or company should support a professional venture of yours. You might write a proposal letter for a number of reasons—for example, to request a grant, a business loan, or that a publisher accept your book idea. There are general formats, details, and arguments you should make in each instance, although the specifics will vary based on the recipient’s requirements. In all cases, however, you must be succinct, informative, and persuasive.

Method 1 Writing a Grant Proposal Letter.
1. Review the eligibility guidelines so you can offer proof throughout the letter. Most public and private organizations that issue grants for research or other projects have a detailed list of eligibility requirements. You must meet these requirements to be eligible, and you must confirm to the organization that you meet these requirements.
Check the organization’s website or call or email them to get complete and up-to-date eligibility guidelines.
Instead of dedicating an entire paragraph to explaining how you meet each requirement, weave this information into the body of your letter as you write it. For instance, if the organization has certain requirements concerning the types of projects the money can be used for and separate requirements for how that money will be allotted, describe these issues in separate paragraphs instead of trying to cram all the information into one.
2. Introduce your organization to an appropriate degree in the first paragraph. If you are not in regular contact with the grant organization, you should introduce your organization in fairly substantial detail in the first body paragraph of your letter. For instance, provide the name of your organization, what it does, why it does it, and who benefits from your organization's work.
If you have had previous contact with the grant agency or organization, don’t rehash basic information the recipient already knows. Instead, mention any changes or developments your organization has made since you were last in contact.
3. Explain your need for the grant and its importance to your organization. Make this the central focus of the second body paragraph. Tell the recipient what your organization hopes to accomplish and what group or groups in society are the focus for your efforts. Also explain why your research, charitable effort, or venture is important and what sort of outcome you are expecting to have.
Balance optimism and realism in this section and throughout the letter. Don’t make outlandish claims like “ending poverty” with this grant. Instead, explain how the grant will help “alleviate food insecurity for at-risk children both before and after school hours.”
4. Provide a timeline and other practical details on how the grant will be used. In the third paragraph, include realistic content about the timeline your project will require, the locations you will operate in and/or impact, and similar information.
State when the project will begin and how long you expect it to run. Be as precise as possible: “If the grant is approved, we intend to operate the program from August 25, 2020 through August 24, 2021.”
Some grants are location-specific. If this is true of the grant you apply for, you will need to indicate where your organization is based, the geographic area that will be studied during your project, or the geographic area that will benefit from the project.
5. Mention how much the project will cost and how much grant money you are requesting. Be as specific as possible so that the grant organization can get an idea of how crucial its funding is. Provide this information in its own paragraph or integrated into the prior paragraph on grant use details.
Particularly if you are applying for a grant without a pre-determined funding amount, be sure to state precisely how much money you are requesting.
Be precise in your cost estimates and provide supporting documentation as enclosures in your application packet, as per the organization’s application instructions.
6. Include any additional information requested in the application instructions. The grant agency or organization may require additional information that should be included in your proposal letter, or it may require separate documents as enclosures in your packet. Refer to the application instructions carefully and frequently, and contact the organization whenever you have questions or need clarification.
Additional documents may include financial budgets, past financial records, and past records indicating the success of similar projects performed by your organization in the past.
Make sure your grant request isn’t delayed or even rejected because you failed to provide a required piece of information.

Method 2 Writing a Business Financing Proposal Letter.
1. Refer to any prior contact at the beginning of the letter. If your business is already established and has a previous relationship with the lender or funder you are contacting, be sure to mention that prior contact. This doesn’t guarantee success for your current request, of course, but it may strengthen your status as a “good bet.”
If you interacted with a specific contact at the company, mention that individual by name. For example: “Nearly seven years ago, I worked with Jane Goodson at your company to help secure the funding that got my business off the ground.”
2. Discuss the size, scope, and focus of your company. Include your mission statement and a short description of the products or services your company provides. To make your case for funding more convincing, also include details like the number of customers served, the number of employees, and information about any administrative boards.
Providing a brief summary of your business helps the funder get a better understanding of who you are, what you do, and why you are a good choice for funding.
Aim to spend 1 paragraph on this content, in most cases.
3. Pinpoint the amount of funding you need and why you need it. Take a paragraph to both identify precisely how much funding you are requesting and explain why you need financial help from the funder. Describe what, specifically, the funding will be used for.
For example: “The $50,000 loan we are requesting will enable us to expand production in our highest-profit product range and grow sales by an estimated 20% within 2 years.”
You may need to include budget data that spells out how funds have been used in the past and projections on how the funds will be used this time around. This additional data may need to be included as a separate attachment.
Regardless of how much information you include in the body of the letter itself, you should always state the total cost of the project and how much of that cost will be covered by the funder's support.
4. Explain how you will use the funding, specifically but succinctly. You need to provide enough information about how the provided funds will be used to make the prospective funder curious and excited by the prospect. Provide key highlights in a paragraph, mentioning specifics but not going into excessive detail.
This should only be a summary. With a full-scale proposal, this information can take pages. This information should take no more than a half page when writing a shorter proposal letter, however. Provide separate enclosures as needed.
5. Offer to provide additional details at the close of your letter. Since a proposal letter is shorter than a full proposal, make it clear that you are willing and able to provide additional details as requested. Do this instead of sending excessive amounts of information that has not been requested with your proposal letter.
For instance, you last sentences might read: “Should you need any further information, please feel free to contact me directly by phone or email. I would also be happy to meet with you at your offices.”
6. Include any necessary enclosures with your packet. Check over the application requirements again. If the prospective funder requires additional documentation along with your proposal letter, include it in the envelope as an enclosure. Note the enclosures in your proposal letter.
Possible documentation might include a list of board members, copies of your tax documents and financial documents, and resumes of key staff members.

Method 3 Writing a Book Proposal Letter.
1. Check the submission guidelines before starting the letter. Every publishing agency and publisher has its own set of submission guidelines. These can usually be found on the publisher's website—if not, call, email, or write to the company and request a copy of their guidelines before proceeding.
Submission guidelines outline the types of books a publisher or agent will accept, as well as the required format and content for the proposal letter.
2. Spend the first few paragraphs describing your book. Right from the start, you need to convince the agent or publisher that the book you want to submit will be successful in the marketplace. In the first paragraph, use around 300 words to write a brief but intriguing summary of your book. Write a second paragraph that describes the essentials of the book, such as genre, word count, and likely market.
If you’re writing fiction or creative non-fiction, outline your narrative and describe your main characters in the first or second paragraph.
State whether or not the book is finished at some point in these opening paragraphs. Note, however, that some publishers will not accept proposals for unfinished works.
3. Identify your expected target market and competitors. Use a paragraph to thoroughly describe the demographic your book is aimed at. If possible, provide provide statistics and make sure they address your target demographic in specific, rather than general, terms.
Perform a competitive analysis in this section. List a few main competitors to your book, explain how well these competitors do in the market, and describe why your book will offer something its competitors do not.
4. Provide biographical information, especially in relation to the book’s subject matter. Describe yourself and explain why you are the perfect person to write this book. Don’t fabricate or exaggerate details, but do put a positive spin on your personal bio.
Mention any writing experience and publishing experience you have.
Mention any experience you have with your book’s subject matter. For instance, if you’ve written a book about fashion and have experience as a fashion designer, include that in your letter.
5. Summarize your intended role in the marketing plan. Provide specific information about what your plans are concerning the promotion of your book once it gets published. Be specific, not general. Do not state what you are willing to do, but rather what you will do.
Instead of writing “I would be willing,” for example, go with “I will.”
Possible forms of marketing include professional blogs, book signings, and professional conferences.
6. Include a more detailed synopsis as a separate enclosure. You will usually need to include a 1-2 page synopsis that describes your book in fuller detail than your 300-word summary at the start of the proposal letter. Unless otherwise directed, include this as an enclosure, not as part of the main body of the letter.
Provide a full summary of the entire plot and purpose of your book. Include all the major details about the plot and significant sub-plots.
7. Enclose a sample table of contents and an extract, if requested. Some publishers expect you to send along a table of contents, an extract from the work, or both. Follow the specific submission guidelines provided by the publisher, and get clarification if needed.
If you do not yet have a table of contents, you may instead need to provide a brief summary of each chapter.
Some publishers and agents will request the first few pages or chapters of your book. Others may not specify which part of the book the extract needs to be pulled from. Regardless, the extract should be an example of your strongest writing.

Method 4 Formatting the Letter.
1. Start by placing your address at the top left of the letter. In the upper left corner of the letter, write your street address on the first line, then the remainder of your address (such as city, state, and ZIP code in the U.S.) on the second line. Left align the text (here and throughout the letter) and single space between lines.
You do not need to include your name or title in the return address, since this information is provided in the closing section.
Do not type out the return address at the top of the letter if you are using paper with a formal letterhead that already includes the address.
2. Include the current date below your address. Double-space after the return address and type the current date in "month-day-year" format in the U.S., or “day-month-year” in nations that typically use that format. The month should be spelled out, but the day and year should be represented by numerical values.[
For instance, write “October 8, 2019” (month-day-year) or “8 October 2019” (day-month-year).
If you are not using a return address because your paper has a formal letterhead, the date should be the first piece of information you add at the top left.
3. Type in the recipient's name, title, and address. Double-space after the date, then use a single-spaced line for each of the following: recipient name; recipient title (if applicable); recipient street address; recipient city, state, etc.
Alternatively, you can put the person’s name and title together on one line—for instance: “Mr. Thomas Jones, Director of Operations.”
Use the person’s personal title—Mr., Ms., Mrs., Dr., etc.—if you know their preference. It’s generally acceptable to assume “Mr.” for a male and “Ms.” for a female. However, you can instead choose to exclude the personal title and write “Thomas Jones” instead of “Mr. Thomas Jones.”
The entire block should be left-aligned and single-spaced.
It’s preferable to write to a specific individual at a company instead of writing a general letter to anyone who may read it.
4. Include an appropriate salutation to the recipient. Double-space after the recipient's address and type the salutation "Dear" followed by the recipient's personal title and last name. End the salutation with a colon, not a comma: “Dear Ms. Amy Watson:”
If you do not know the recipient's preferred personal title and prefer not to assume either “Mr.” or “Ms.”, skip the personal title and use the recipient's full name: “Dear Amy Watson:”
Double space after the salutation as well.
5. Write the body of your letter using single-spaced block paragraphs. The exact content and length of your proposal letter will of course vary depending on the type of proposal you’re writing. The format of the letter should remain the same for each type, though.
Single space and left justify each paragraph.
Do not indent the first line of your paragraphs.
Double space between paragraphs.
6. Use an appropriate closing and signature. Double-space after the final body paragraph and include a formal closing, followed by a comma. Hit the "Enter" key four times before typing your full name and personal title—this blank space is for your signature.
Capitalize only the first word of your formal closing—That is, “Thank you” instead of “Thank You.”
Common closing options include “Thank you,” “Sincerely,” “Regards,” “Best regards,” and “Best wishes.”
Add a comma after the formal closing.
7. Mention any enclosures below your signature and name and title line. If you send any enclosures with your proposal letter, like a resume with an employment proposal or financial information with a business proposal, indicate this by double-spacing after your typed name and title and typing "Enclosure” or “Enclosures.”
You also have the option of listing each document you are enclosing. Use the following format: “Enclosures: resume, writing sample, 3 letters of reference.”
8. Review the letter for spelling, grammar, and formatting errors. Run your finished letter through a spell-check program, but don't stop there. Read it out loud to check for any awkward phrasing or grammar errors. If possible, have someone else read through it as well, since they may spot errors that you've missed.
Don't let a silly spelling error or misplaced comma reduce the impact of an otherwise carefully-crafted letter. Proofreading is important!

FAQ.

Question : How do I write a proposal for a musical tour?
Answer : dentify the potential donors and outline your plans for the tour, including the bands involved, the venues where you will be playing, and an estimate of the upfront costs and potential profit. If this will be for charity, clearly identify the cause.
Question : How do I write a proposal letter to the ministry of safety, wanting to supply them with stop signs and police gear?
Answer : A proposal is generally understood to mean something the receiver has not yet thought of. "Dear city council, after reading your urban planning blueprints, I propose to plant more trees" rather than "I see you're looking for trees and I want to sell you some." Governments are typically bound by public tenders when they buy equipment, so if you want to sell signs and gear, you have to submit your offer when they issue a tender and hope yours is the best of all offers received.

Tips.
If someone else typed the letter for you, double space after the enclosures line and include their initials. For example, add “HU” if Hilary Underwood typed the letter for you.

April 07, 2020